Academic Acceleration
The Challenge
You’re setting measurable proficiency goals and framing the work as acceleration rather than remediation. Chicago Public Schools is committed to acceleration opportunities for students in grades 4 through 12, a strategy it calls Equitable Acceleration Pathways.1 Hillsborough County Public Schools brands its strategic plan Accelerate Hillsborough.2 The vocabulary has shifted, and the work beneath it is harder than the language suggests: identifying where each student actually is, addressing gaps, and keeping students moving toward grade-level expectations at the same time.
How Edmentum helps K-12 leaders move students forward, not just catch them up
Students don’t all start in the same place, so acceleration starts with precise knowledge of where each student is. Exact Path Insights gives educators that picture and tracks progress toward state proficiency across the year.
That knowledge only matters if it changes what happens next. Depending on what a student needs, that’s personalized instruction targeting their specific skill gaps, grade-level standards, or live, educator-led tutoring for students who need more intensive support.
You shouldn’t have to choose between addressing unfinished learning and keeping students connected to grade-level work. Multiple levels of support, one goal: measurable progress toward grade-level expectations.
1 Chicago Public Schools, Success 2029: Together We Rise, five-year strategic plan. Equitable Acceleration Pathways is a named strategy within the plan. Priorities: https://www.cps.edu/sites/five-year-plan/priorities/ | Full plan: https://www.cps.edu/globalassets/cps-pages/sites/5-year-plan/documents/cps-success-2029-together-we-rise.pdf
2 Hillsborough County Public Schools, Strategic Acceleration Plan 2021–2026, branded Accelerate Hillsborough. https://go.boarddocs.com/fl/sdhc/Board.nsf/files/C7GM3Y548DF5/$file/Hillsborough%20County%20Public%20Schools%205-Year%20Plan.pdf
Know where students are, with data you can trust
Psychometric | Assessment Quality
Exact Path Insights assessments predict student performance on 28 state summative assessments, as well as the ACT®, SAT®, and PSAT®, at levels exceeding the National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) strong correlation threshold. Exact Path identifies student needs regardless of gender, ethnicity, disability, economic status, or multilingual learner classification.3
- AL: 0.79
- AR: 0.76
- AZ: 0.79
- CA (SBAC (8 states)): 0.76
- FL: 0.77
- IA: 0.79
- IN: 0.83
- KY: 0.78
- LA: 0.82
- MT: 0.83
- NC: 0.82
- NH: 0.85
- NJ: 0.84
- OH: 0.83
- OK: 0.75
- PA: 0.82
- SC: 0.76
- TN: 0.80
- TX: 0.78
- VA: 0.83
- WI: 0.82
- ACT: 0.86
- PSAT: 0.78
- SAT: 0.77
NCII strong correlation threshold
- AL: 0.79
- AR: 0.76
- AZ: 0.79
- CA (SBAC (8 states)): 0.76
- FL: 0.77
- IA: 0.79
- IN: 0.83
- KY: 0.78
- LA: 0.82
- MT: 0.83
- NC: 0.82
- NH: 0.85
- NJ: 0.84
- OH: 0.83
- OK: 0.75
- PA: 0.82
- SC: 0.76
- TN: 0.80
- TX: 0.78
- VA: 0.83
- WI: 0.82
- ACT: 0.86
- PSAT: 0.78
- SAT: 0.77
3 Correlation thresholds reflect National Center on Intensive Intervention technical review standards, where 0.7 or above is rated strong. Predictive validity was established through linking studies conducted by Edmentum Psychometric Research and third-party researchers. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/psychometric-research/
Psychometric | Assessment Quality
NCII: Convincing Evidence From Kindergarten to Grade 12
NCII maintains the Academic Screening Tools chart, which states and districts use to compare screeners against national technical standards.4 Most tools on the chart stop at grade 8. Exact Path Insights is one of only three screening assessments with high school ratings in both English and Math.4 The chart gives districts an external review of Exact Path Insights’ high-quality technical characteristics, including classification accuracy, reliability, and validity, in reading and mathematics grades K-12. Our ratings don’t just span the full continuum of grades—they also demonstrate strong evidence of technical quality with 85% of ratings at NCII’s “convincing evidence” threshold, and zero “unconvincing evidence” ratings.4
4 National Center on Intensive Intervention, Academic Screening Tools Chart, last updated August 2026, accessed 10.09.2026. NCII posts all tools that meet its criteria for review, regardless of results. The chart represents tools reviewed, not tools approved, and its presence is not an endorsement or recommendation. https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/ascreening This year, we provided technical evidence for grades K-1, and we now have research results (not yet published to the NCII website) in grade 12. The grade 12 evidence that we will submit to NCII during their next review period is available now, upon request.
States approve Exact Path for screening and intervention
This year, Exact Path added 13 state assessment and intervention approvals, bringing the total to 44 state and national list approvals, demonstrating our rigor, validity, and alignment with standards.
State approval indicates that a resource meets state expectations of demonstrated quality and rigorous evidence. Oklahoma approved Exact Path under its Strong Readers Act as a K-3 screener for reading deficiencies and dyslexia risk, and separately approved Exact Path Math as a universal screener, including characteristics of dyscalculia. Kentucky approved it as a K-3 universal numeracy screener. Rhode Island approved it as a supplemental intervention in literacy and math, K-12.5
Shaded states hold one or more approvals. Some states appear once on the map but hold multiple approvals. National list approvals are not state-specific.
- Prior year approval
- New approval
5 State assessment and intervention approvals, 2025–26 academic year, as of July 31, 2026. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/approvals/
Causal | Strong Evidence
Targeted Skills Instruction improved students’ reading achievement
This year, Edmentum met the highest bar in education research for the first time.6
An evaluation of Targeted Skills Instruction, our high-impact tutoring program, met the ESSA Tier 1 standard for strong evidence and the What Works Clearinghouse 5.0 standards without reservations.6 In a large New Jersey district, students scoring at or below the 25th percentile were selected for tutoring. Among students near that cutoff, those who received Targeted Skills Instruction improved because of it, gaining an average of 16.79 points on the state ELA assessment. That moved them roughly 20 percentile points ahead in reading and made them 2.5 times more likely to read at grade level compared to similar peers.7
6 Third-party validated study of Targeted Skills Instruction, large New Jersey district, 2,000+ students in grades 3, 4, and 6 who began the year below grade level. Regression discontinuity design. Meets ESSA Tier 1 and What Works Clearinghouse 5.0 standards without reservations. The causal estimate applies to students near the district's 25th-percentile eligibility cutoff, not to every student who received tutoring. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/targeted-skills-instruction-substantially-improves-reading-achievement/
7 “Nearly 1 performance level higher” based on RDD model-based mean difference estimated right at the cut score. This difference was 16.79, and the performance level in which most of these students (“Partially Met”) were estimated to place had a width of 25. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/targeted-skills-instruction-substantially-improves-reading-achievement/
Comparative | Moderate Evidence
Students using Exact Path Proficiency alongside Growth scored higher than students using Growth alone
A 2024–25 Florida study met ESSA Tier 2 requirements and What Works Clearinghouse standards with reservations. Middle school students using Exact Path Proficiency together with Exact Path Growth scored significantly higher on Florida's FAST assessments in both ELA and mathematics than students who used neither. Students using Growth alone also outperformed non-users, but the combination was associated with the largest gains.8
8 Florida study, 2024–25, grades 6-8. Meets ESSA Tier 2 and WWC standards with reservations. Comparison groups: Growth and Proficiency users, Growth-only users, non-users. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/exact-path-proficiency-amplifies-the-positive-impact-of-exact-path-growth
Comparative | Moderate Evidence
Correlational | Promising Evidence
Positive Exact Path results hold from kindergarten through grade 10
Four ESSA-rated studies found positive effects on state testing associated with Exact Path across the K-10 grade span in math and reading. One finding of particular note from this series of studies: 19 percent of high schoolers who started below grade level reached proficiency by spring, compared with 11 percent of non-users.9
9 Florida research brief compiling four ESSA-rated studies on FAST assessments across grades K–10: grades K–2 and 3–4 at ESSA Tier 2, grades 6–8 and 9–10 at ESSA Tier 3. Separately, Evidence for ESSA (Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University) rates Exact Path Growth as ESSA Tier 2, in both reading and math, based on a grade 6 quasi-experimental study in Duval County Public Schools, Florida, 2023–24 (reading n=4,367, effect size +0.16; math n=4,597, effect size +0.06). Brief: https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/accelerated-gains-k-10-on-florida-fast-with-exact-path. Independent ratings: https://www.evidenceforessa.org/program/exact-path-reading/ and https://www.evidenceforessa.org/program/exact-path-math/.
Comparative | Moderate Evidence
Correlational | Promising Evidence
Adolescent literacy: Exact Path reading evidence extends into the middle grades
Grades 6–8 students in five Texas districts who completed at least one Exact Path skill scored higher on the spring 2024 STAAR Reading assessment than students who did not use it.10
In grades 4–5, completing more Exact Path skills was associated with higher spring 2024 STAAR Reading scores.11
Customer-Reported | District-Measured Outcomes
A district reports: more data, more teacher confidence
East Central Independent School District reports higher student engagement, increased teacher confidence, and more data-driven instructional planning since implementing Exact Path.13
“[Exact Path] gives the teacher freedom to be able to monitor all of that and facilitate the different things that the kids need.”
10 Exact Path in Texas, grades 6–8, ESSA Level 2 study, 2023–24 school year. Evaluation conducted by Instructure, which was paid by Edmentum to serve as evaluator. Reading sample: 530 students across five schools in five Texas public school districts (286 Exact Path users, 244 non-users). Quasi-experimental comparative design with propensity score weighting; baseline equivalence established on pretest. Hedges' g = 0.13, p = .046 on spring 2024 STAAR Reading. Math analyses in the same study met ESSA Level 3 based on correlational findings for special education and Hispanic students only. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/exact-path-growth-led-to-improved-achievement-in-texas
11 Exact Path in Texas, grades 4–5, ESSA Level 3 study, 2023–24 school year. Evaluation conducted by Instructure, which was paid by Edmentum to serve as evaluator. 134 Exact Path users across three schools in three Texas public school districts. Correlational design with statistical controls for selection bias; no comparison group. Number of skills completed was positively associated with spring 2024 STAAR Reading scores (r = 0.70, p = .043). https://www.edmentum.com/impact/efficacy-research/exact-path-growth-led-to-improved-achievement-in-texas
12 National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2024 Reading Assessment, grade 8. The national average eighth-grade reading score was 2 points lower than in 2022 and 5 points lower than in 2019. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/reading/2024/g4_8/?grade=8
13 Outcomes reported by East Central Independent School District. Edmentum does not independently verify district-reported data and does not attribute district outcomes to a single product. https://www.edmentum.com/impact/success-stories/enhancing-student-support-systems-with-streamlined-teacher-responsibilities/
Our Approach | Stated Intent
Our goal isn’t more screen time.
It’s more purposeful learning time.
A student who is behind has the least time to spare, which is why every digital experience we build clears three gates before it earns that time: a clear instructional purpose, grounding in evidence, and a design that amplifies educator expertise rather than replacing it. Targeted Skills Instruction live tutoring is delivered through a screen, but what the student experiences is human instruction, immediate feedback, and individualized support.
This year we added 15,000 standards-aligned lessons to Exact Path Proficiency, along with family and caregiver reporting, and goal-setting and progress-tracking reports.14
14 Product innovations for Back-to-School 2026–27 academic year. https://www.edmentum.com/solutions/back-to-school
Awards and recognition
Exact Path won Tech and Learning Awards of Excellence: Best of the Year in both Primary Education and Secondary Education, Tech and Learning Best of Show at ISTELive 2025 in both Primary and Secondary, and The Tech Edvocate Award for Best Personalized/Adaptive Learning App or Tool. It was a finalist in the EdTech Digest Cool Tool Awards for Best Adaptive Learning Solution and Best Math Solution, a BETT Awards finalist in Assessment, Planning, and Progress Monitoring, and shortlisted for the Global EdTech Prize in the Majors category.15
Targeted Skills Instruction, Virtual Tutoring, won Tech and Learning Best of Show at ISTELive 2025 in both Primary and Secondary. It was a finalist in the EdTech Digest Cool Tool Awards for Best Tutoring Solution and in The Tech Edvocate Awards for Best Tutoring/Test Prep App or Tool.15
15 Awards received during the 2025–26 academic year. https://www.edmentum.com/about/newsroom/?refinementList%5BnewsType%5D%5B0%5D=Awards